Aleksandr Nedovyesov vs Flavio Cipolla Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L L L W L L
Form
W W L L W W W W L LH2H: Nedovyesov 2 - 0 Cipolla
They have played 4 sets in total, with Nedovyesov winning 4 and Cipolla winning 0. The last match between Nedovyesov and Cipolla was at the Kazan Challenger, 14-03-2016, First, I.hard with Aleksandr Nedovyesov getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Aleksandr Nedovyesov | 2 |
| Flavio Cipolla | 0 |
Kazan Challenger(14-03-2016)
6
4
6
3
| Nedovyesov | Stats | Cipolla |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 870 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 72 | Highest Rank | 70 |
| 38 | Age | 41 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 9 |
| 56% (343-275) | Career Total W/L | 54% (474-404) |
| $264,683 | Career Prize Money | $656,393 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kostovic VS Stefanini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Nedovyesov VS Cipolla H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Aleksandr Nedovyesov
Player
Flavio Cipolla
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 7-6(3) 6-3 |
Stats
Aleksandr Nedovyesov
Player
Flavio Cipolla
47%
(
32 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Nedovyesov VS Cipolla H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 16 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:17:12 | Average Match Time | 1:17:12 |
| 58% (66/114) | 1st Serve % | 68% (86/127) |
| 77% (51/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (57/86) |
| 60% (29/48) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (14/41) |
| 78% (7/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 44% (56/127) | Return Points Win % | 30% (34/114) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Aleksandr Nedovyesov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Erler
Player
Aleksandr Nedovyesov
50%
(
52 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
8
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
7
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
48%
(
25 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Aleksandr Nedovyesov
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
17 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandr Nedovyesov
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
70%
(
68 of
97)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
99)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
31%
(
30 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Aleksandr Nedovyesov
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Aleksandr Nedovyesov
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fernando Verdasco
Player
Aleksandr Nedovyesov
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
1
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandre Muller
Player
Aleksandr Nedovyesov
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
5
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandr Nedovyesov
Player
Fabien Reboul
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandr Nedovyesov
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
36 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Aleksandr Nedovyesov
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Flavio Cipolla Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Tepavac
Player
Flavio Cipolla
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Flavio Cipolla
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
78%
(
36 of
46)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Flavio Cipolla
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Flavio Cipolla
Player
Altug Celikbilek
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Flavio Cipolla
Player
Orlando Luz
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cipolla
Player
Joao Pedro Sorgi
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Flavio Cipolla
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
8
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Enrique Lopez-Perez
Player
Flavio Cipolla
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
9
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Flavio Cipolla
Player
Pascal Brunner
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve %
73%
(
60 of
82)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Flavio Cipolla
Player
Dragos Dima
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (343/275) | Win/Loss | 54% (474/404) |
| 55% (789/653) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (1066/980) |
| 52% (7146/6620) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (9547/9177) |
| 56% (115/90) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (140/95) |
| 58% (156/115) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (274/225) |
| 52% (65/60) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41% (46/67) |
| 41% (7/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 45% (14/17) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 1991 | Aces Total | 443 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 868 | Total Double Faults | 1431 |
| 1:7:39 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 598.11 | Average Opponent Rank | 596.38 |
| 66% (20998/31650) | 1st Serve % | 71% (23486/33164) |
| 69% (14587/20998) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (14498/23486) |
| 50% (5307/10652) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4586/9679) |
| 40% (1200/2997) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1669/3729) |
| 38% (12332/32054) | Return Points Win % | 42% (14321/33770) |
| 41% (16/23) | Slam W/L | 54% (41/35) |
| 0% (0/4) | Masters W/L | 42% (22/30) |
| 25% (2/6) | Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) |
| 31% (11/25) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (66/73) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (217/163) | Challenger W/L | 54% (259/222) |
| 64% (97/54) | Futures W/L | 66% (85/44) |
| 57% (333/586) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (455/841) |
| 35% (7/20) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 36% (9/25) |
| 52% (111/213) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (95/195) |
| 51% (97/191) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (152/268) |
| 85% (351/297) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (438/376) |
| 15% (351/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (438/61) |
| 17% (267/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (438/92) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
